Constantin Brancusi, Romania / France (1876-1957)
The Father of Modern Sculpture
|
“Simplicity is not an end in art, but one arrives at simplicity in spite of oneself, by approaching the real sense of things. Simplicity is, at its core, a resolved complexity.”
Brancusi, Constantin. Brancusi: Exhibition Catalogue, November 17 – December 15, 1926, Brummer Gallery, New York. Born in 1876 in Hobița, southwestern Romania, Constantin Brancusi first trained at the Craiova School of Arts and Crafts, then at the National School of Fine Arts in Bucharest. He arrived in Paris on July 14, 1904, beginning an apprenticeship at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts in the studio of Antonin Mercié until 1907. He worked there, alongside Auguste Rodin, but eventually decided to leave, famously stating that “nothing grows in the shade of tall trees.” This break marked the true starting point for his work. From his early Parisian years, Brancusi developed a radically personal language based on the simplification of forms, the search for the essence of material, and the refinement of volumes. His time at Cité Falguière was decisive: there he moved within a circle of cosmopolitan artists and laid the foundations of an intellectual community. Thanks to renowned art collector, Dr. Paul Alexandre, he met Amedeo Modigliani, who came to learn direct carving in his studio between 1907 and 1911. Also circulating around him were Chaïm Soutine, Jacques Lipchitz, Moïse Kisling, and Ossip Zadkine. Montparnasse became the center of this burgeoning modernity. |
Constantin Brancusi, "Autoportrait dans l'atelier", vers 1934
Négatif gélatino-argentique sur plaque de verre (image positive ici) 15 x 10 cm © Succession Brancusi - All rights reserved (Adagp). Photo : Centre Pompidou, MNAM-CCI/Dist. RMN-GP |
The Studio as a Total Work of Art
In 1916, Brancusi moved to Impasse Ronsin at the edge of the Montparnasse district. This complex of studios, near La Ruche (founded by Alfred Boucher in 1902), became the nerve center of his creation. Over time, he occupied several spaces — three studio rooms and an upstairs bedroom — which he affectionately called his "three shacks."
Early on, the studio transcended its simple function as a workspace. Brancusi conceived it as a full-fledged exhibition space. He divided it into a private zone dedicated to creation and an open zone for visitors. The arrangement of the works, the lighting, the pedestals, and the alignments were planned with extreme precision. Each sculpture engaged in a dialogue with the space and the others. The studio became an authentic and personal experience, with the artist himself acting as the guide. Architectural historian, Sibyl Moholy-Nagy described a visit to Brancusi’s studio:
“He went from pedestal to pedestal, triggering mechanisms ranging from a simple rope pulley to a complex set of gears. All his great sculptures were there, many in unusual versions. [...] Each piece sat on a carved pedestal that then began to rotate, set in motion by Brancusi. Once they were all in motion, he smiled. [...]. There it is.”
Passionate about photography since the 1920s, Brancusi installed a darkroom in his studio and took photographs of his sculptures. “Why write about my sculptures? Why not simply show their photos?” he told a journalist in 1947. Photographing his work was not merely a documentary tool but a constitutive step in the creative process. In his eyes, the image restored the presence and vibration of form better than any discourse.
A Place of Socializing and Transmission
Contrary to the image of a solitary artist, the Impasse Ronsin studio was a living space frequented by collectors, critics, writers, and artists. Brancusi welcomed international apprentices — Militza Pătrașcu, Isamu Noguchi, Juana Muller, and Sanda Kessel — among whom he shared fundamental techniques: carving stone, polishing bronze, and working with wood. Accounts describe a demanding but generous master, blending technical rigor with conviviality.
Romanian artist, Irène Codréano recalls:
“We would come to his studio in the morning, give it a sweep, and then we would knead the clay and prepare small loaves for his work. He showed us how to hold and use the chisel and hammer, and sometimes, when we hurt our fingers, he would tell us: ‘It doesn't matter, the craft is getting in!’ Toward noon, he would ask us: ‘Hey, guys, what are we going to eat? One must eat well to work well!’ He cooked alone on his stove, carving the chicken and grilling it. He washed down every meal with generous gulps of wine. After lunch, we went back to work. He taught us how to polish bronze, carve stone or wood. In the evening, he showed us how to photograph sculptures. He was the only one who knew how to photograph sculptures.”
Music also occupied a central place in his world. As a friend of Erik Satie and Darius Milhaud, Brancusi organized evenings where people played and sang. Musicality permeates through his work, in the rhythm of forms, elevation, and repetition. Peggy Guggenheim once noted: “The walls are covered with every imaginable instrument he needs for work. Next door, there is a small room where you can sit on a tree trunk and listen to Oriental music; the gramophone was made by Brancusi himself.” Dance was not absent either; certain choreographies, such as those by Lizica Codréano, took shape in the heart of the studio.
International Recognition and Modern Art Scandal
The year 1926 marked a decisive turning point. On the occasion of its shipment to the United States, Bird in Space triggered a famous lawsuit against the American administration. Deemed too abstract to be considered a sculpture under the Tariff Act of 1922, the work was taxed as a manufactured object. The highly publicized trial became a key moment in the institutional recognition of modern art. The final decision in favor of Brancusi legitimized abstraction.
Exhibitions at the Brummer Gallery in New York (1926 and 1933-34), as well as the presentation of his work at the Museum of Modern Art in 1936, affirmed his international influence. A friend of Marcel Duchamp and attentive to every detail of the hanging, Brancusi gave precise instructions for the presentation of his sculptures, anxious to preserve their formal autonomy and visual intensity.
In 1938, the only monumental installation completed by Constantin Brancusi was inaugurated in Târgu Jiu, Romania. Commissioned in 1937 to honor the memory of soldiers fallen during the First World War, the project moved the artist deeply. This commission instigated his return to the country for the first time in thirty years. Initially limited to the Endless Column, the commission expanded through Brancusi’s personal commitment, when he financed the addition of the Gate of the Kiss and the Table of Silence. With its monumental axis set along the Avenue of Heroes, Brancusi transformed the very notion of a monument: it no longer imposed itself as an isolated form, but exists through the relationship between form, landscape, and the spectator’s path.
The Studio as a Museum Matrix
From the 1950s onward, Brancusi produced only a few new works and devoted himself almost exclusively to the arrangement of his studio. When a sculpture was sold, he replaced it with a plaster cast to maintain the overall balance. He took care to preserve the unity of this place, which he considered a work in its own right. “I am no longer anything but the guardian of my own museum,” he stated.
On April 12, 1956, he bequeathed his entire studio to the French state, on the condition that the Musée National d’Art Moderne faithfully reconstruct its layout. Upon his death on March 16, 1957, he left behind 144 sculptures and sketches, along with dozens of pedestals, molds, drawings, photographs, and an extensive library and record collection.
Léna Belhabib
Art Historian
Translated from French by Clare Patrick
For bibliography and French version
© L'AiR Arts and Cité Falguière Associations, 2025
In 1916, Brancusi moved to Impasse Ronsin at the edge of the Montparnasse district. This complex of studios, near La Ruche (founded by Alfred Boucher in 1902), became the nerve center of his creation. Over time, he occupied several spaces — three studio rooms and an upstairs bedroom — which he affectionately called his "three shacks."
Early on, the studio transcended its simple function as a workspace. Brancusi conceived it as a full-fledged exhibition space. He divided it into a private zone dedicated to creation and an open zone for visitors. The arrangement of the works, the lighting, the pedestals, and the alignments were planned with extreme precision. Each sculpture engaged in a dialogue with the space and the others. The studio became an authentic and personal experience, with the artist himself acting as the guide. Architectural historian, Sibyl Moholy-Nagy described a visit to Brancusi’s studio:
“He went from pedestal to pedestal, triggering mechanisms ranging from a simple rope pulley to a complex set of gears. All his great sculptures were there, many in unusual versions. [...] Each piece sat on a carved pedestal that then began to rotate, set in motion by Brancusi. Once they were all in motion, he smiled. [...]. There it is.”
Passionate about photography since the 1920s, Brancusi installed a darkroom in his studio and took photographs of his sculptures. “Why write about my sculptures? Why not simply show their photos?” he told a journalist in 1947. Photographing his work was not merely a documentary tool but a constitutive step in the creative process. In his eyes, the image restored the presence and vibration of form better than any discourse.
A Place of Socializing and Transmission
Contrary to the image of a solitary artist, the Impasse Ronsin studio was a living space frequented by collectors, critics, writers, and artists. Brancusi welcomed international apprentices — Militza Pătrașcu, Isamu Noguchi, Juana Muller, and Sanda Kessel — among whom he shared fundamental techniques: carving stone, polishing bronze, and working with wood. Accounts describe a demanding but generous master, blending technical rigor with conviviality.
Romanian artist, Irène Codréano recalls:
“We would come to his studio in the morning, give it a sweep, and then we would knead the clay and prepare small loaves for his work. He showed us how to hold and use the chisel and hammer, and sometimes, when we hurt our fingers, he would tell us: ‘It doesn't matter, the craft is getting in!’ Toward noon, he would ask us: ‘Hey, guys, what are we going to eat? One must eat well to work well!’ He cooked alone on his stove, carving the chicken and grilling it. He washed down every meal with generous gulps of wine. After lunch, we went back to work. He taught us how to polish bronze, carve stone or wood. In the evening, he showed us how to photograph sculptures. He was the only one who knew how to photograph sculptures.”
Music also occupied a central place in his world. As a friend of Erik Satie and Darius Milhaud, Brancusi organized evenings where people played and sang. Musicality permeates through his work, in the rhythm of forms, elevation, and repetition. Peggy Guggenheim once noted: “The walls are covered with every imaginable instrument he needs for work. Next door, there is a small room where you can sit on a tree trunk and listen to Oriental music; the gramophone was made by Brancusi himself.” Dance was not absent either; certain choreographies, such as those by Lizica Codréano, took shape in the heart of the studio.
International Recognition and Modern Art Scandal
The year 1926 marked a decisive turning point. On the occasion of its shipment to the United States, Bird in Space triggered a famous lawsuit against the American administration. Deemed too abstract to be considered a sculpture under the Tariff Act of 1922, the work was taxed as a manufactured object. The highly publicized trial became a key moment in the institutional recognition of modern art. The final decision in favor of Brancusi legitimized abstraction.
Exhibitions at the Brummer Gallery in New York (1926 and 1933-34), as well as the presentation of his work at the Museum of Modern Art in 1936, affirmed his international influence. A friend of Marcel Duchamp and attentive to every detail of the hanging, Brancusi gave precise instructions for the presentation of his sculptures, anxious to preserve their formal autonomy and visual intensity.
In 1938, the only monumental installation completed by Constantin Brancusi was inaugurated in Târgu Jiu, Romania. Commissioned in 1937 to honor the memory of soldiers fallen during the First World War, the project moved the artist deeply. This commission instigated his return to the country for the first time in thirty years. Initially limited to the Endless Column, the commission expanded through Brancusi’s personal commitment, when he financed the addition of the Gate of the Kiss and the Table of Silence. With its monumental axis set along the Avenue of Heroes, Brancusi transformed the very notion of a monument: it no longer imposed itself as an isolated form, but exists through the relationship between form, landscape, and the spectator’s path.
The Studio as a Museum Matrix
From the 1950s onward, Brancusi produced only a few new works and devoted himself almost exclusively to the arrangement of his studio. When a sculpture was sold, he replaced it with a plaster cast to maintain the overall balance. He took care to preserve the unity of this place, which he considered a work in its own right. “I am no longer anything but the guardian of my own museum,” he stated.
On April 12, 1956, he bequeathed his entire studio to the French state, on the condition that the Musée National d’Art Moderne faithfully reconstruct its layout. Upon his death on March 16, 1957, he left behind 144 sculptures and sketches, along with dozens of pedestals, molds, drawings, photographs, and an extensive library and record collection.
Léna Belhabib
Art Historian
Translated from French by Clare Patrick
For bibliography and French version
© L'AiR Arts and Cité Falguière Associations, 2025
